تأثیر شکاف گفتمان حاکمیتی برکارآمدی جمهوری‌ اسلامی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای مسائل ایران، دانشکده حقوق، الهیات و علوم‌سیاسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 استاد گروه علوم‌سیاسی و مطالعات انقلاب اسلامی، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه علوم‌سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق الهیات و علوم سیاسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

4 دانشیار گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

هدف: بررسی تأثیر شکاف‌های گفتمانی موجود در جمهوری اسلامی بر مسئله‌ی کارآمدی است. در این راستا باید توجه داشت که کارآمدی شاخص ارزیابی و مقبولیت مردمی حاکمیت‌ها است. این شاخص ‌نشان می‌دهد که یک نظام سیاسی چگونه توانسته است به اهداف خود در عمل ‌‌دست یابد و یا تا چه حد با آن فاصله دارد. جمهوری ‌اسلامی، نظامی است که از ابتدای حضور خود، بر مبنای گفتمان‌اسلامی - ایرانی اهداف مشخصی را تعریف و سعی نمود که به آنها دست یابد.
روش‌شناسی پژوهش: گفتمان لاکلا و موفه
یافته‌ها: این نظام پس از گذراندن دوره‌ی تثبیت و پویایی خصوصاً در دوران جنگ تحمیلی، با وارد شدن به دوره‌ی جدید حیات خود پس از جنگ با تحولاتی چند رو‌به‌رو شد. مسئله‌ی تغییر رهبری، اصلاح قانون‌ اساسی، تمرکز بیشتر قدرت در قوه‌ی مجریه، بازسازی کشور، تغییر در نظام بین‌الملل، موجب ایجاد شکاف‌هایی در میان نخبگان درون حکومت شد و هر چه پیشتر آمد، این شکاف‌ها موجب «تعارضات گفتمانی» گردید. خرده‌ گفتمان‌های چهار‌گانه‌ای که از 1368 به این ‌سو شکل گرفت موجب شد که بخش مهمی از نیروی سیاسی کشور به ‌جای پرداختن به امور اساسی اداره کشور، به‌ رفع یا دامن زدن به این تعارضات سیاسی بپردازند.
نتیجه‌گیری: شکاف گفتمانی در جمهوری‌ اسلامی، موجب بی‌ثباتی و ناکارآمدی نظام ‌سیاسی شده ‌و انسجام قدرت را در ایران به خطر انداخته است، که همین، خود بر تداوم ناکارآمدی و بی‌ثباتی، تأثیر مستقیم گذاشته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع

  • Afsordeh, Ataullah et al. (1398), “The Discourse of the Islamic Revolution and Drawing an Alternative Model for the Government”, Sepehr Siyasat, Vol. 6, No. 20. 47: 68.
  • Aghahseni, Alireza (2017). Another Discourse and Acceptance, Isfahan: Isfahan University Press. (In Persian)
  • Akhavan Kazemi, Bahram (2003). “The Concept of Characteristics and Methods of Promoting Efficiency in the System of the Islamic Republic of Iran”, Strategy, No. 29. 75: 96.
  • Ameri Golestani, Hamed and Nafiseh Sadat Ghaderi (2012), “A Discourse View on Islamophobia”, Political Research in the Islamic World, Year 2, Issue 4. 129: 153.
  • Attar, Saeed and Ali Khajeh Naeini (2015). “The Analysis of Affecting Factors in Inefficiency of Iran’s Policy Making System”, Public Policy, Vol. 1, No. 1. 1: 20.
  • Behroozalak, Gholamreza and Gholamreza Zabatekari (2012), “Theoretical Challenges of Social Justice in the Governments of the Islamic Republic of Iran”, Political Science, Fifteenth Year, No. 57. 103: 148.
  • Bowman, Paul (2019). “The limits of post-Marxism: the (dis)function of political theory in film and cultural studies”, Global Discourse, vol. 9, no.2. 347: 350.
  • Dalili, Shahab (2015), Social Justice and the Efficiency of the Political System in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Strategic Studies, Year 21, Issue 4 (Serial No. 82).61: 92.
  • Dehghani Firoozabadi, Jalal (2014), The Discourse Cycle in the Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran from the Bazargan Government to the Rouhani Government, Tehran: mokhatab. (In Persian)
  • Dehghani Firoozabadi, Jalal and Mehdi Ataei (2015), “Discourse Analysis of the Nuclear Policy of Ahmadinejad's Government from Hegemony to Decline”, Iranian Research letter of International Politics, Fourth Year, Issue 1. 22: 58.
  • Eivazi, Mohammad Rahim (2010). “Comparison of Religious Democracy and Liberal Democracy”, Yas Strategy, No. 21. 299: 311.
  • Gomshad, Maryam (2015). “Formation of the Discourse of Moderation, Reform, Rationality in the Iranian Political Field”, International Conference on Humanities, Psychology and Social Sciences, Tehran, November.
  • Haghighat, Sadegh (2006), Methodology in Political Science, Qom: Mofid University of Humanities. (In Persian)
  • Heidari, Arman and Hakimeh Malek Ahmadi (1398), “Analysis of the Representation of Women in the Discourse of Moderation: Discourse Analysis of Hassan Rouhani's Lectures”, Women's Research Journal, Year 10, Issue 4. 53: 76.
  • Hosseinizadeh, Mohammad Ali (2007), Political Islam in Iran, Qom: Mofid University. (In Persian)
  • Jalali, Reza and Mehdi Gholami (2010), “The intellectual cohesion of political elites within the government and the formation of stability in the political system”, International Relations Studies, Vol 3, No 12. 199: 228.
  • Jessop, Bob (2019). “Critical discourse analysis in Laclau and Mouffe’s post-Marxism”, Simbiótica, Revista Eletrônica, vol 6, no 2. 08: 30.
  • Jorgensen, Marian and Louise Phillips (2010), Theory and Method in Discourse Analysis, translated by Hadi Jalili, Tehran: Ney. (In Persian)
  • Kazemi, Hojat (1398). “Functions and dysfunctions of elections in Iran: Towards completing the chain of electoral policy”, Strategic Policy Research, Year 8, No. 30. 9: 43.
  • Kazemi, Hojat and Gholamreza Basirnia (2015). “Internal Disputes in the Political Structure and Challenges of Cultural Reproduction in the Islamic Republic of Iran”, Intercultural Studies, Year 13, No. 37 9: 35.
  • Khajeh Saravy, Gholamreza (2016), “A Comparative Study of Religious Democracy in the View of Ayatollah Khamenei and Ayatollah Shamsuddin”, Strategic Research in Politics, Fifth Year, No. 17. 9: 39.
  • Khaleghi, Ali (1396), “The Discourses of the Islamic Revolution and the Issues and Challenges Facing It”, Sepehr Siyasat, Fourth Year, Issue 11. 7: 21.
  • Khoei, Mohammad Mehdi (2016), “Class Analysis with the Approach of Laclau and Moff Theory of Discourse: A Study of the Discourses of the Islamic Republic of Iran Towards the Modern Urban Middle Class from 1989 to 2013”, Sociological Studies Vol. 23, No. One. 215: 236.
  • Khomeini, Ruhollah (2010), Sahifa Noor, Vol. 12, Tehran: Imam Khomeini Publishing House.
  • Khomeini, Ruhollah (2010), Sahifa Noor, Vol. 5, Tehran: Imam Khomeini Publishing House.
  • Khorramshad, Mohammad Baqer and Javad Jamali (2000), “Political Affairs and Political Discourses in Iran after the Islamic Revolution (1978-1397)”, Islamic Revolution Studies, Vol 15, No 15, 165: 184.
  • Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Moff (2013). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards Radical Democratic Politics, translated by Mohammad Rezaei, Tehran: Saless Edition. (In Persian)
  • Maghsoudi, Mojtaba and Simin Hajipour Sardoei (2013). “Human as the Nodal Point in Discourse Moderation Discourse: An Analysis of the Governance of Imam ALI”, Political and International Approaches, Fifth Year, No. 35.81: 113.
  • Majidi, Hassan and Mohsen Rahiminia (1397). “Moderation Discourse Analysis in the Eleventh Presidential Election”, Strategic Policy Research, Year 7, No. 25, (52 consecutive). 125: 155.
  • Maleki, Ali (1397). “Principles of Legitimacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran: Multiple Interpretations; Challenges and Solutions”, Transcendental Politics, Year 6, Issue 21.77: 94.
  • Motahari, Morteza (2001). Education in Islam, Tehran: Sadra. (In Persian)
  • Nozari, Hamzeh and Alireza Karimi (2012). “Discourse Analysis of Changing Meaning of Development after the Islamic Revolution in Iran”, Vol. 19, No. 1. 57: 78.
  • Parvane, Mahmoud (2015), “Critique of the constructive government discourse based on Imam Khomeini's political discourse”, Andisheh Velayat, first year, No. 1. 87: 119.
  • Poorzaki, Giti (1398), “The Evolution of Discourse Confrontation in the Islamic Republic of Iran Post-Political, Antagonistic, or Agonistic Confrontation”, Political Sociology of the Islamic World, Vol 7, No 2 (15 consecutive). 231: 254.
  • Rabbani Khorasghani, Ali and Mohammad Mirzaei (2015), “Analysis of Contrast between perincipalism and Reformism Discourses in the Tenth Presidential Election in Iran”, Applied Sociology, Twenty-sixth Year, Consecutive Issue (60), Fourth Issue. 45: 68.
  • Rahimi, Alireza (1398), “The Discourse of Moderation and National Security in the Islamic Republic of Iran (1392 to 1396)”, 23rd year, first issue, serial NO. 83. 33: 72.
  • Razmjoui, Mehran (2013). The Ninth Government and the European Union: A Change in the Foreign Policy Discourse of the Islamic Republic of Iran, by the Center for Strategic Studies of the Presidency. (In Persian)
  • Rezaei Jafari, Mohsen et al. (2016), “The Discourses of the Islamic Revolution of Iran and the Necessities of Disseminating Its Values in the Age of Globalization Based on Laclau and Mouffe Theory of Discourse”, Strategic Studies of Public Policy, Vol. 6, No. 20. 85: 110.
  • Rouhani, Hassan (2000), “Legitimacy and Efficiency”, Strategy, No. 18. 7: 36.
  • Shiri, Hamed (2016). “The Typology of Political Culture and Itspathologocal Implications for Political Stability and Civil Society in Contemporary Iran”, Politics, Vol.50, No.1. 173: 189.
  • Thomassen, Lasse (2016), Hegemony, populism and democracy: Laclau and Mouffe today (review article), Revista Española de Ciencia Política. Núm. 40. 161: 176.
  • Zamaneh Monthly (2009). “Discourse Analysis of the Theory of the Islamic Revolution”, No. 84 and 85.
  • Zolfaghari, Vahid (2015), “Elections, Political Factions and Parasitic Peace in Iran; Representatives of Political Gaps or Peace Agents”. Strategic Studies of Public Policy, Vol. X, No. XX.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار